Based on the discussion in the subcommittee meeting my understanding on how use cases get worked from the beginning to the end is like follow:
1. Use case subcommittee discuses new use cases 2. Use case subcommittee gets feedback from community including integration team on feasibility 3. Iterate back to 1. 4. TSC approval 5. Integration project leads (coordinates) effort to get detailed flows with the help of the other projects and the release manager 6. Detailed flows are defined and projects write there user stories/implement them 7. Integration team tests flows and use case Did I capture this correctly? Does that make sense to everybody? Thx Oliver _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
