Are we considering Application Benchmarking as part of the use case efforts?

        Certain measurements may be essential to make sure SLAs can be met 
under various conditions.
Thxs
Tom Tofigh 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SPATSCHECK, OLIVER
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 7:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [onap-discuss] Use Case Subcommittee Flow

*** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***.
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.


Based on the discussion in the subcommittee meeting my understanding on how use 
cases get worked from the beginning to the end is like follow:

1. Use case subcommittee discuses new use cases
2. Use case subcommittee gets feedback from community including integration 
team on feasibility
3. Iterate back to 1.
4. TSC approval
5. Integration project leads (coordinates) effort to get detailed flows with 
the help of the other projects and the release manager
6. Detailed flows are defined and projects write there user stories/implement 
them
7. Integration team tests flows and use case

Did I capture this correctly? Does that make sense to everybody?

Thx

Oliver
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=UY_ZNE-YO2kndJN0BSg2tg&m=dXwp18p1vFoEvGovHQKaL1Gj-c25cbEFIn_KR7WpyPc&s=ZUvffeIGYtXNF9Q83mF40QRaizTeLldnVsoWo99SeaY&e=
 
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to