Thanks! 

I was under impression that as ONAP spins of services, it will include 
monitoring policies for SLA measurements. 
 Are we going to consider that a set of VNFs are representation of services, 
and therefore operational aspect of services are part of ONAP ?

Regards
Tom Tofigh 
[email protected] 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alla Goldner [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:34 AM
To: TOFIGH, TOM <[email protected]>; SPATSCHECK, OLIVER 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Use Case Subcommittee Flow

Hi Tom,

My understanding is that it is not directly related to our ONAP work. 
This may be taken as an optional part of VNF validation process, per specific 
operator requirements. 

 Best regards, 

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division 
Amdocs Technology





-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of TOFIGH, TOM
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 5:43 PM
To: SPATSCHECK, OLIVER <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Use Case Subcommittee Flow

Are we considering Application Benchmarking as part of the use case efforts?

        Certain measurements may be essential to make sure SLAs can be met 
under various conditions.
Thxs
Tom Tofigh 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SPATSCHECK, OLIVER
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 7:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [onap-discuss] Use Case Subcommittee Flow

*** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***.
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.


Based on the discussion in the subcommittee meeting my understanding on how use 
cases get worked from the beginning to the end is like follow:

1. Use case subcommittee discuses new use cases 2. Use case subcommittee gets 
feedback from community including integration team on feasibility 3. Iterate 
back to 1.
4. TSC approval
5. Integration project leads (coordinates) effort to get detailed flows with 
the help of the other projects and the release manager 6. Detailed flows are 
defined and projects write there user stories/implement them 7. Integration 
team tests flows and use case

Did I capture this correctly? Does that make sense to everybody?

Thx

Oliver
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=UY_ZNE-YO2kndJN0BSg2tg&m=dXwp18p1vFoEvGovHQKaL1Gj-c25cbEFIn_KR7WpyPc&s=ZUvffeIGYtXNF9Q83mF40QRaizTeLldnVsoWo99SeaY&e=
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=JvRfu2NdQLc7FGEAiFlLyw&m=GaUo15CRIUN89UsNdkKngCofVOraU4LBi-dTgkW3VUg&s=2SMZfXt-yClQGAPml5QlLq5qQkxgl8ViEry2-tI8Q0A&e=
 
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwIFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=JvRfu2NdQLc7FGEAiFlLyw&m=GaUo15CRIUN89UsNdkKngCofVOraU4LBi-dTgkW3VUg&s=sUe306Hs6v7DUff9LCABXjJpgIsH7YV2IKKvM5xgNW0&e=
  
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwIFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=JvRfu2NdQLc7FGEAiFlLyw&m=GaUo15CRIUN89UsNdkKngCofVOraU4LBi-dTgkW3VUg&s=sUe306Hs6v7DUff9LCABXjJpgIsH7YV2IKKvM5xgNW0&e=
 >

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to