I'm sorry, but IISOMI is NOT an "industry standard". It is an "informal agreement" that has some consensus among some parts of the industry.
In fact, it contains a number of incorrect conclusions about what UML is and is not, and greatly limits the power of using UML constructs. John On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:07 PM, jessie jewitt < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello Hui and Lingli- > I've noticed that the modeling guidelines defined here: > https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003072 > > do not specify that we should be following the industry defined UML > Modeling Guidelines (IISOMI 514) and Papyrus Guidelines (IISOMI 515) > defined here: > https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=20874416 > > As a result, there are ONAP IM models being developed that are not in > conformance with industry standard guidelines. (For example, some of the > Service IM class attributes do not conform to using lower camel case). > > If these IISOMI Guidelines have not been "accepted" as ONAP Guidelines, > I'd like to propose an agenda item to discuss this at the next modeling > subcommittee meeting. > > Thank you, > Jessie > > _______________________________________________ > onap-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss > > -- regards, John
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
