If you have any questions or comments regarding MEF's use of modeling guidelines, or modeling techniques, please let me know and I will communicate your request to the MEF committee chairs and the CTO. -Jessie
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:15 PM, John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, the MEF is NOT using these guidelines anymore, mainly due to the > errors with respect to UML interpretation and the restrictions placed on > what UML artifacts can be used in a model. > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM, jessie jewitt <jessie.jewitt@ > oamtechnologies.com> wrote: > >> You are correct that it is not an "industry standard" like an IEEE spec. >> It is an informal agreement by industry players to use the same UML >> Modeling Guidelines. The ONF, ETSI, and MEF use these guidelines, even >> though you personally may choose not to do so. >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:42 PM, John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm sorry, but IISOMI is NOT an "industry standard". It is an "informal >>> agreement" that has some consensus among some parts of the industry. >>> >>> In fact, it contains a number of incorrect conclusions about what UML is >>> and is not, and greatly limits the power of using UML constructs. >>> >>> John >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:07 PM, jessie jewitt < >>> jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Hui and Lingli- >>>> I've noticed that the modeling guidelines defined here: >>>> https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003072 >>>> >>>> do not specify that we should be following the industry defined UML >>>> Modeling Guidelines (IISOMI 514) and Papyrus Guidelines (IISOMI 515) >>>> defined here: >>>> https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=20874416 >>>> >>>> As a result, there are ONAP IM models being developed that are not in >>>> conformance with industry standard guidelines. (For example, some of the >>>> Service IM class attributes do not conform to using lower camel case). >>>> >>>> If these IISOMI Guidelines have not been "accepted" as ONAP Guidelines, >>>> I'd like to propose an agenda item to discuss this at the next modeling >>>> subcommittee meeting. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Jessie >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> onap-discuss mailing list >>>> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org >>>> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> regards, >>> John >>> >> >> > > > -- > regards, > John >
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
