One case that wasn't in Chaker's list, but might trigger some discussion 

would be:



 An elected TSC member representing Operator A takes a job with a Vendor A 

that does not have a representative on the TSC.



As written, the charter proposal says that the TSC member keeps his/her 

seat and Operator A would be without a representative on the TSC (until 

the next election cycle).  However, the table in the top of the document 

states otherwise (Operator A can appoint a new member and the TSC member 

might keep their seat if the TSC numbers are not exceeded).



We need to sync up the charter language with the table, if the table is 

what we intend.





Regards,

Jason Hunt 

Distinguished Engineer, IBM 



Phone: 314-749-7422

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @DJHunt

 







From:   "Chaker Al Hakim" <[email protected]>

To:     "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

Date:   10/17/2018 03:29 PM

Subject:        Re: [onap-tsc] JIRA TSC-1 "Update TSC Chart to address how 

to hanlde a vacancey"

Sent by:        [email protected]







Hi Steve,

 

Thanks for the clarifications

 

Regards,

Chaker

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 

Of Stephen Terrill

Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 2:59 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] JIRA TSC-1 "Update TSC Chart to address how to 

hanlde a vacancey"

 

Hi Chaker,

 

Discussion is always welcome – I wanted to point out though that I believe 

that the cases you proposed are covered in the proposal, which I will 

clarify below:

1.       If an elected TSC member from an Operator A changes jobs and 

moves to Operator B that’s already represented on the TSC board 

a.       Would the ‘TSC Member’ be forced to resign based on the TSC rules 

or Operator(s) make the decision?)

b.      Would the TSC run a new election?

c.       Who would be eligible to run?

Steve: I believe this is covered.  This would violate the TSC composition 

rules, hence the moving TSC member would stepdown or be considered as 

such.

2.       An elected TSC member representing Operator A takes a job with a 

Vendor A that is already represented with an elected TSC member 

a.       Would the ‘TSC Member’ be forced to resign based on the TSC rules 

or Operator/vendor make the decision?

b.      Would the TSC run a new election?

c.       Who would be eligible to run in the new election?

Steve: I believe this is covered.  This would violate the TSC composition 

rules, hence the moving TSC member would stepdown or be considered as 

such.

3.       If an elected TSC member from Vendor A takes a job with vendor B 

which had failed to win a TSC seat during the official TSC election (this 

is an interesting case) 

a.       Would the ‘TSC Member’ be forced to resign based on the TSC rules 

or Operator and/or vendor make the decision?)

b.      Who would be eligible to run in the new election?

c.       Eligibility

Steve: I believe this is covered.  According to this proposal, the TSC 

member is not forced to resign as the TSC composition rules are not 

violated.

 

Of course its another thing if there is disagreement for the basis of the 

proposal. 

 

BR,

 

Steve

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 

Chaker Al Hakim

Sent: Wednesday 17 October 2018 20:27

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] JIRA TSC-1 "Update TSC Chart to address how to 

hanlde a vacancey"

 

Hi all,

 

I had sent the attached email back in September proposing a few more cases 

to consider so that we don’t have to work the same exercise again when/if 

they do occur.

I’d like to include them in the discussion tomorrow and decide as a team 

on how we move forward.

 

Thanks,

Chaker

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 

Of Stephen Terrill

Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 4:15 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: [onap-tsc] JIRA TSC-1 "Update TSC Chart to address how to hanlde 

a vacancey"

 

Hi,

 

As TSC-1 jira is on the TSC agenda, a proposal has been uploaded.  While 

this and previous versions have been shared with the Task force, there is 

still ongoing discussion however I thought that it fair to share the 

latest proposal with the TSC members before the meeting this week.

 

It is attatched in the jira: 

https://jira.onap.org/browse/TSC-1?src=confmacro 

 

BR,

 

Steve

 

 



 

Stephen Terrill 

Senior Expert, Automation and Management

 

TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST

BDGS RDP Architecture & Technology

Phone: +34913393005

Mobile: +34609168515

[email protected]

 

Ericsson

C/ Via de los Poblados 13. B

28033,Madrid, Madrid

Spain

ericsson.com

 



 

Our commitment to Technology for Good and Diversity and Inclusion 

contributes to positive change.

Follow us on: Facebook LinkedIn Twitter



Legal entity:ERICSSON AB registration number 556056-6258, registered 

office in Stockholm.

This communication is confidential. Our email terms: 

www.ericsson.com/en/legal/privacy/email-disclaimer










-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3932): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3932
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27378093/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to