Thanks Jason,
Thanks for the comment. I thought that the proposed text (given the
principles) covered the case, maybe you see something that I miss:
The proposed amendment indicates "That TSC member may remain a member unless:
1) the moves places the member in conflict with the TSC composition rules" and
that the current composition rules state:
* Size and structure
* The TSC shall consist of eighteen (18) seats
* Nine seats are reserved for operators
Please note operators is defined as a specific set of companies
Meaning that such a move would violate the current composition rules -> hence
the moving TSC member would be considered to have stood down.
Is there a way to make it clearer (I hesitate to draw out a specific list of
scenarios in the text as that is when I thought we may miss a case)?
BR,
Steve
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jason Hunt
Sent: Wednesday 17 October 2018 23:08
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] JIRA TSC-1 "Update TSC Chart to address how to hanlde a
vacancey"
One case that wasn't in Chaker's list, but might trigger some discussion would
be:
An elected TSC member representing Operator A takes a job with a Vendor A that
does not have a representative on the TSC.
As written, the charter proposal says that the TSC member keeps his/her seat
and Operator A would be without a representative on the TSC (until the next
election cycle). However, the table in the top of the document states
otherwise (Operator A can appoint a new member and the TSC member might keep
their seat if the TSC numbers are not exceeded).
We need to sync up the charter language with the table, if the table is what we
intend.
Regards,
Jason Hunt
Distinguished Engineer, IBM
Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Twitter: @DJHunt
From: "Chaker Al Hakim"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: 10/17/2018 03:29 PM
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] JIRA TSC-1 "Update TSC Chart to address how to
hanlde a vacancey"
Sent by: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
________________________________
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the clarifications
Regards,
Chaker
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 2:59 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] JIRA TSC-1 "Update TSC Chart to address how to hanlde a
vacancey"
Hi Chaker,
Discussion is always welcome - I wanted to point out though that I believe that
the cases you proposed are covered in the proposal, which I will clarify below:
1. If an elected TSC member from an Operator A changes jobs and moves to
Operator B that's already represented on the TSC board
a. Would the 'TSC Member' be forced to resign based on the TSC rules or
Operator(s) make the decision?)
b. Would the TSC run a new election?
c. Who would be eligible to run?
Steve: I believe this is covered. This would violate the TSC composition
rules, hence the moving TSC member would stepdown or be considered as such.
2. An elected TSC member representing Operator A takes a job with a
Vendor A that is already represented with an elected TSC member
a. Would the 'TSC Member' be forced to resign based on the TSC rules or
Operator/vendor make the decision?
b. Would the TSC run a new election?
c. Who would be eligible to run in the new election?
Steve: I believe this is covered. This would violate the TSC composition
rules, hence the moving TSC member would stepdown or be considered as such.
3. If an elected TSC member from Vendor A takes a job with vendor B which
had failed to win a TSC seat during the official TSC election (this is an
interesting case)
a. Would the 'TSC Member' be forced to resign based on the TSC rules or
Operator and/or vendor make the decision?)
b. Who would be eligible to run in the new election?
c. Eligibility
Steve: I believe this is covered. According to this proposal, the TSC member
is not forced to resign as the TSC composition rules are not violated.
Of course its another thing if there is disagreement for the basis of the
proposal.
BR,
Steve
From:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
On Behalf Of Chaker Al Hakim
Sent: Wednesday 17 October 2018 20:27
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] JIRA TSC-1 "Update TSC Chart to address how to hanlde a
vacancey"
Hi all,
I had sent the attached email back in September proposing a few more cases to
consider so that we don't have to work the same exercise again when/if they do
occur.
I'd like to include them in the discussion tomorrow and decide as a team on how
we move forward.
Thanks,
Chaker
From:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>[mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 4:15 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [onap-tsc] JIRA TSC-1 "Update TSC Chart to address how to hanlde a
vacancey"
Hi,
As TSC-1 jira is on the TSC agenda, a proposal has been uploaded. While this
and previous versions have been shared with the Task force, there is still
ongoing discussion however I thought that it fair to share the latest proposal
with the TSC members before the meeting this week.
It is attatched in the jira:
https://jira.onap.org/browse/TSC-1?src=confmacro
BR,
Steve
Stephen Terrill
Senior Expert, Automation and Management
TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST
BDGS RDP Architecture & Technology
Phone: +34913393005
Mobile: +34609168515
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Ericsson
C/ Via de los Poblados 13. B
28033,Madrid, Madrid
Spain
ericsson.com<http://www.ericsson.com/>
Our commitment to Technology for
Good<http://www.ericsson.com/thecompany/sustainability-corporateresponsibility>
and Diversity and
Inclusion<http://www.ericsson.com/thecompany/diversity-inclusion> contributes
to positive change.
Follow us on:
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/ericsson>LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/ericsson>Twitter<https://twitter.com/Ericsson>
Legal entity:ERICSSON AB registration number 556056-6258, registered office in
Stockholm.
This communication is confidential. Our email terms:
www.ericsson.com/en/legal/privacy/email-disclaimer<https://www.ericsson.com/en/legal/privacy/email-disclaimer>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3940): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3940
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27378093/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
