Am 14.06.2011 23:31, schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Frank Peters wrote:
What caught my eye was the statement that some material was under
special licensing and you'd have to notice that on an individual-page
basis.
That is indeed the case and the licensing situation on the
wiki has traditionally been awkward. But couldn't Oracle
remedy this by (as copyright holder) relicensing the content
under AL like done with the source?
Hi Frank,
um, I think the point made here is that certain content is *not*
copyright-shared with Oracle, and thus cannot be (easily)
relicensed?
The point was about licenses and not copyright.
The mentioned wiki Copyright page says
"Copyright 1999, 2010 by the contributing authors and
Oracle and/or its affiliates."
Frank
