Frank Peters wrote: > >um, I think the point made here is that certain content is *not* > >copyright-shared with Oracle, and thus cannot be (easily) > >relicensed? > > The point was about licenses and not copyright. > > The mentioned wiki Copyright page says > "Copyright 1999, 2010 by the contributing authors and > Oracle and/or its affiliates." > Hi Frank,
I think you've lost me here. Since Oracle does not exclusively own the copyright for individual content, surely it cannot relicense it unilaterally? Especially it cannot remove copyright statements like http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Authors_licensing_declaration as per http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use ยง4 c? Disclaimer: I have a stake in this, being one of the people listed on the page above ... Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgp4XpWmhxe5W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
