Ivo Hinkelmann wrote: > I would also prefer that we just called it "OpenOffice.org". This brand > is known everywhere and this is not a fork but the moved "original" OOo > project.
Same for me. This Apache podling has many nice features, but its most distinctive ones are: - Participation of many Hamburg developers - Ownership of the OpenOffice.org trademark These elements of continuity can be very reassuring to users, and the project communication should take advantage of it. If there is the strict requirement of having "Apache" in the name, "Apache OpenOffice.org" would be the natural candidate, but it still sounds weaker than the well known "OpenOffice.org" brand. Regards, Andrea.
