On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]>wrote:
> Ivo Hinkelmann wrote: > > I would also prefer that we just called it "OpenOffice.org". This brand > > is known everywhere and this is not a fork but the moved "original" OOo > > project. > > Same for me. This Apache podling has many nice features, but its most > distinctive ones are: > - Participation of many Hamburg developers > - Ownership of the OpenOffice.org trademark > +1 I think is a strong solid brand, even if it has been diluted a bit with all the minor changes "Open Office" and "OpenOffice". Still most people on the know recognize "OpenOffice.org" 10 year history. > > These elements of continuity can be very reassuring to users, and the > project communication should take advantage of it. If there is the > strict requirement of having "Apache" in the name, "Apache > OpenOffice.org" would be the natural candidate, but it still sounds > weaker than the well known "OpenOffice.org" brand. > > Regards, > Andrea. > > -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
