When the users actually do what they want to name the product and/or
project, IMHO then there is no need to change anything that you cannot
predict. Then we can stick with the known brand name and also avoid any
legal problems with companies that use also "OpenOffice" as brand.
Marcus
Am 07/12/2011 12:10 PM, schrieb Kai Ahrens:
Am 12.07.2011 10:59, schrieb Graham Lauder:
http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html
It is important that we maintain that share and grow it.
There is a large community: 35,000 individuals subscribed to OOo
maillists when I last checked, Louis may have more up-to-date numbers
Around 800 have signed the JCA/SCA
Scores possibly Hundreds of Millions of Users worldwide and growing
And interestingly, the whole site speaks of OpenOffice product wise,
with just one link to the openoffice.org website (!)...
And this is, what people all over the world do: speaking of OpenOffice
and just using OpenOffice.org for very formal reasons. So why stick to
the nerdy OpenOffice.org, when everybody already associates OpenOffice
with the real product. OpenOffice.org doesn't seem to be such a strong
brand name per se to me, does it?
