Kay, I'd like to start taking some of the material that is beautifully captured on your OOo-to-ASF-site-recommendation page down to the next level of detail. I think linking to additional pages is the way to do it, with those pages focused on details at the next level for a very specific topic, such as the Bugzilla migration.
1. I was thinking the hot links would be added into the "Migration Recommendations" cells. Does that fit with your thinking? 2. Also, I don't know a good way to tie in discussion on the OOo-to-ASF... page. There is nothing like a Discuss tab. Do you have a preference? 3. Finally, I see your primary restructuring separation. I agree to that in principle. There are clearly cross-over points where the user side provides a gateway to the developer side, as it were. My question: I don't know how your categories map to that restructuring. Are they meant to, or not? Thanks for the attention to coverage and detail, it is a big help. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 14:24 To: OOo Apache Subject: [discuss][www][wiki] Native-lang sites was Web, WIki, and Participation Continuing our discussion from Thurs, if you now go to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Site-PPMC-Plan and navigate through this "portal", specifically the survey of existing OOo services, I tried to reorganize some things, and include the web pages in this overview. and, did address some of the "old" questions (topics) in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OOo-to-ASF-site-recommendation So, maybe that will help. [ ... ]
