Hi Jürgen, first off, glad to hear you stay with our code & the ecosystem! :)
Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > From my point of view the reasons for the fork are not longer > valid and it should be possible to continue one project, one > office together. > I don't believe it's helpful to start a discussion by asserting that the other party's motivations are no longer valid. > But from a technical perspective it doesn't make sense to split the > resources in 2 groups working on more or less the same thing. > Oh, I'm perfectly with you on that one! :) > It is still early enough to reunify the code base and use the well > known brand OpenOffice for a binary release. It would be the best > choice for our users. > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but binary releases bearing that name can only be made by the ASF, or can they? Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgpYp5tCmwqoi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
