> > or why not just shake hands and part as friends. > Of course we can but that makes inefficient use of the resources and is less good for Open Source in general. Fine strategy if we had thousands of developers in each project and a MS size budget.
> > Two projects and two applications. > > - if AOO wants to get on desktops they need to produce an application > that better addresses the needs of their target user base then LibO > Given the number of full time developers now at AOO it is really just a matter of time to get a good desktop product out. Whether it is better or not than the LibO version will always be debateable. (I suspect for most users it will never be more than a marginal decision since most don't use most of what is there now). Rather than taking the competitive option why not the cooperative? The real competition is MS Office and there are already other open source office suites such as Koffice to provide some diversity. - if LibO wants desktops they need to better addresses the needs of > their target user base then AOO. > Of course on that logic why not fork every FOSS project to increase competition in the market? -- Ian Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ) www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940 The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.
