TJ, I am not entirely comfortable having [email protected] (the correct list), and maybe the other forward to a non-Apache location, though I think it would be valuable to support the authors@ d.oo.o address.
An intermediate solution would be to create ooo-documentation @i.a.o now (it looks like there is at least one willing moderator already) and forward to that. The ODFAuthors could certainly subscribe to that. The footer provided on ooo-documentation list forwardings could even include a link to a wiki page description of other places to discuss documentation, provide feedback, contribute documents, reviews and edits, etc. How does that sound? - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: TJ Frazier [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 02:49 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [odfauthors-discuss] Feedback link for our documents [ ... ] The actual use, i.e., valuable traffic, on those lists is very small, but still important. I get one or two "nibbles" per week, from newcomers wanting to help with documentation. My boilerplate reply sends them to the wiki page, or even to LO. I would strongly suggest that these two @oo.o addresses be forwarded to ODFA (assuming they want that – we should ask), unless and until we establish our own doc ML, and not forever; probably until we consider OO.o v3.x obsolete. To use a famous figure, 500K addresses might over-stress ezmlm, but two shouldn't. [ ... ]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
