On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > TJ, > > I am not entirely comfortable having [email protected] > (the correct list), and maybe the other forward to a non-Apache location, > though I think it would be valuable to support the authors@ d.oo.o address. > > An intermediate solution would be to create ooo-documentation @i.a.o now (it > looks like there is at least one willing moderator already) and forward to > that. The ODFAuthors could certainly subscribe to that. The footer > provided on ooo-documentation list forwardings could even include a link to a > wiki page description of other places to discuss documentation, provide > feedback, contribute documents, reviews and edits, etc. >
Rather than creating another list on speculation that it might get sufficient traffic, could we just forward the legacy address to ooo-dev? If it ends up generating sufficient traffic then it will be easy enough to create a dedicated list for it. But I'm not in favor of creating a new list for it at this point. -Rob > How does that sound? > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: TJ Frazier [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 02:49 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [odfauthors-discuss] Feedback link for our documents > > [ ... ] > > The actual use, i.e., valuable traffic, on those lists is very small, > but still important. I get one or two "nibbles" per week, from newcomers > wanting to help with documentation. My boilerplate reply sends them to > the wiki page, or even to LO. > > I would strongly suggest that these two @oo.o addresses be forwarded to > ODFA (assuming they want that – we should ask), unless and until we > establish our own doc ML, and not forever; probably until we consider > OO.o v3.x obsolete. To use a famous figure, 500K addresses might > over-stress ezmlm, but two shouldn't. > > [ ... ] >
