Considering how repulsive ooo-dev is for folks who are not developers, I don't think piling onto ooo-dev is providing a service in this case. ooo-user might work, though. But neither are inviting for folks who are specifically interested in the documentation and would subscribe to such a list. I would expect traffic on ooo-documentation to be comparable to that for ooo-marketing.
- Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Rob Weir [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 09:23 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [odfauthors-discuss] Feedback link for our documents On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > TJ, > > I am not entirely comfortable having [email protected] > (the correct list), and maybe the other forward to a non-Apache location, > though I think it would be valuable to support the authors@ d.oo.o address. > > An intermediate solution would be to create ooo-documentation @i.a.o now (it > looks like there is at least one willing moderator already) and forward to > that. The ODFAuthors could certainly subscribe to that. The footer > provided on ooo-documentation list forwardings could even include a link to > a wiki page description of other places to discuss documentation, provide > feedback, contribute documents, reviews and edits, etc. > Rather than creating another list on speculation that it might get sufficient traffic, could we just forward the legacy address to ooo-dev? If it ends up generating sufficient traffic then it will be easy enough to create a dedicated list for it. But I'm not in favor of creating a new list for it at this point. -Rob [ ... ]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
