Hi (Nonsense words? iPad's spellchecker.)
-- Louis Suárez-Potts On 2011-11-18, at 21:07, MiguelAngel <mari...@miguelangel.mobi> wrote: > El 19/11/11 0:50, Rob Weir escribió: >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts >> <lsuarezpo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> <snip> >> >>> I pretty much did the initial draft of the page and set the logic of >>> what counted as "participate" and "contribute". And I was raked over >>> the coals by the United Developers of the World who critiqued my >>> conflation of any old contribution with sophisticated development. >>> Point taken, they were right, I was wrong, but the point was to grow >>> the project and to thus justify its existence. Development would come, >>> once the market was established. >>> >>> So now we are here. What do we want out of this? Do we want to re-do >>> the strategy of yore and expand the market? >>> >> Hi Louis, I was making a much narrower point, that if I were looking >> to donate cash to an open source project, I would not think to look >> under a link that read "I want to participate". That was my only >> point. I wasn't expressing an opinion on code versus other forms of >> participation. We need and welcome volunteers of all kinds. >> >> -Rob > Hi Louis, Rob, > Please, who is ** we **? > Maybe can be misunderstood. > Miguel Ángel Dunno, but it probably includes you, unless you can present an argument why it oughtn't. :-) > >