On 01.03.2012 21:45, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Andre Fischer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012 11:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: How can we get OpenOffice started with Pootle?
On 01.03.2012 14:25, imacat wrote:
On 2012/03/01 18:57, Andre Fischer said:
On 29.02.2012 19:50, imacat wrote:
On 2012/02/29 18:23, Jürgen Schmidt said:
1) Developers (I for example) could start with converting PO to SDF
without (necessarily) the pootle server.
I don't get it. Could you please clarify on this? Did you mean
that we download the PO, run po2oo offline and commit?
Yes, something like that. Usually the PO files live on the pootle server and
are transformed during the download to AOO. As we do not have an active
pootle server we can either
What do you mean by the statement "We do not have an active pootle server" ??
There is https://translate.apache.org , been up for months, please concentrate
your pootle
efforts in helping to get that working for your needs -- it is after all your
project that
asked for it in the first place !!
Yes I know that and I hope and think that I have acknowledged that
before. Apparently I chose the wrong words. I meant this:
We (Apache OpenOffice) have not yet started to put our data on the
Apache pootle server and have not yet integrated that server into our
localization process.
I used the word "active" in the context of Apache OpenOffice not Apache
in general.
I know and appreciate that the Apache pootle server is up and running
and assume it works just fine.
-Andre
Gav...
a) setup the pootle server, then upload the PO files and finally download the
SDF files, or
b) store the PO files somewhere (where they do not get lost) and convert
them directly into SDF. This, of course, would be only a temporary solution.
2) It would be a start to drop support for SDF files in the long run
and use PO files directly.
+1 That is best. SDF really sucks.
