On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:45:19 +0000 Simon Phipps <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 13 Mar 2012, at 19:02, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > I really think this posting is very valuable though. > > > > I propose that you write them into a FAQ and that after fixing > > it according to the consensus in this list we publish it in > > the openoffice.org website. > > The public Wiki is probably a better place. > > >>>> No downloads of OpenOffice.org containing bug fixes or > >>>> security updates have been made available for end users > >>>> since Oracle stopped development. > > > > I find this statement particularly dangerous: Apache > > OpenOffice is by all means the official source of bug fixes > > and security updates for OpenOffice.org. > > Well, it will be. But right now there's nothing to download so > the statement is factual, surely? As Rory has pointed out, AOO > 3.4 is the focus of development. One doesn't want to say openly that AOO 3.4 is the only focus of development and support, although we know it is. -- Rory O'Farrell <[email protected]>
