On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > --- Mar 13/3/12, eric b <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >> Hi, >> >> Could we remove the LibreOffice link from the main page ? >> (e.g. just put the name of the derivated software) ? >> > +1 > > Simon added the mention to libreoffice, and he removed my line explaining > that Oracle had chosen to given the project to a Foundation with the > governance and credibility to maintain it (Apache). > > Simon; we know you are very fond of the LibreOffice guys and most of us are > OK with that but you are committer and PPMC member and you are expected to > wear your Apache hat here. >
Just consider that page to be brainstorming on possible FAQ's and answers. In the end the PMC will determine the questions that are included in the FAQ's as well as the responses. But I am already concerned that some of the questions are inappropriate and will need to be removed. For example, we should not be answering questions about what Oracle has or hasn't done. That is not our palce. At most we should refer to Oracle press releases or other authoritative statements. In any case, I encourage you all to brainstorm freely, try not to censor yourself or others too much or too early. Brainstorming is best when unhindered. I volunteer, when things are cooled down, to edit the FAQ's, convert them to MDText and seek PMC approval for including them in our website's Community FAQ items. I've done most of the other FAQ's. It will be easy enough to get these added. -Rob > Pedro. > >> >> Thanks, >> Eric >> >> >> >> Le 13 mars 12 à 21:53, Pedro Giffuni a écrit : >> >> > >> > >> > --- Mar 13/3/12, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak <[email protected]> >> ha scritto: >> > ... >> >> >> >> If YOU (the reader) disagree with a specific >> statement in >> >> the original post (shown below if you really need >> to see >> >> it), please be specific about which statement and >> how you >> >> would fix the statement. As an example, some >> clarification >> >> was provided that left me less confused with >> respect to the >> >> developers currently working on the project. >> >> >> > >> > Done. >> > >> >> Off hand, I agree with the general facts of the >> statements. >> >> I see that some take issue with the tenor; I >> disagree with >> >> that but I also see it as mostly irrelevant with >> respect to >> >> the facts. >> >> >> >> Oh, and I tip my hat to you Mr. Phipps for your >> starting >> >> this: >> >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Current+Status+FAQ >> >> >> >> Seems you digested this much better than I. >> >> >> > >> > Give me some credit too ... I caused it ;-). >> > >> > Pedro. >> > >> >> --qɔᴉɹə >> Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page >> L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org >> Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news >> >> >> >> >> >>
