Sorry, I thought he was an initial committer. My apologies !!
I drop back my comment but I will still clarify the issue in the wiki. Pedro. --- Mar 13/3/12, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Da: Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> > Oggetto: Re: Clarifying facts > A: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Data: Martedì 13 marzo 2012, 16:33 > Since when is Simon a committer and > PPMC member? > Can't we get over the parochialism here and just > provide some practical advice to users that isn't > distorted one way or another? > > At Apache we aren't in competition with other projects, > we provide our work for the public benefit and leave > discretion about adoption to the public. Please keep > that in mind, and stick to providing resources that > benefit general members of the public. > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected] > > >Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:28 PM > >Subject: Re: Clarifying facts > > > > > > > >--- Mar 13/3/12, eric b <[email protected]> > ha scritto: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Could we remove the LibreOffice link from the main > page ? > >> (e.g. just put the name of the derivated software) > ? > >> > >+1 > > > >Simon added the mention to libreoffice, and he removed > my line explaining that Oracle had chosen to given the > project to a Foundation with the governance and credibility > to maintain it (Apache). > > > >Simon; we know you are very fond of the LibreOffice guys > and most of us are OK with that but you are committer and > PPMC member and you are expected to wear your Apache hat > here. > > > >Pedro. > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Eric > >> > >> > >> > >> Le 13 mars 12 à 21:53, Pedro Giffuni a écrit : > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > --- Mar 13/3/12, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak > <[email protected]> > >> ha scritto: > >> > ... > >> >> > >> >> If YOU (the reader) disagree with a > specific > >> statement in > >> >> the original post (shown below if you > really need > >> to see > >> >> it), please be specific about which > statement and > >> how you > >> >> would fix the statement. As an example, > some > >> clarification > >> >> was provided that left me less confused > with > >> respect to the > >> >> developers currently working on the > project. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Done. > >> > > >> >> Off hand, I agree with the general facts > of the > >> statements. > >> >> I see that some take issue with the tenor; > I > >> disagree with > >> >> that but I also see it as mostly > irrelevant with > >> respect to > >> >> the facts. > >> >> > >> >> Oh, and I tip my hat to you Mr. Phipps for > your > >> starting > >> >> this: > >> >> > >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Current+Status+FAQ > >> >> > >> >> Seems you digested this much better than > I. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Give me some credit too ... I caused it ;-). > >> > > >> > Pedro. > >> > > >> > >> --qɔᴉɹə > >> Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page > >> L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org > >> Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
