Hi. 2012/5/23 Paulo de Souza Lima <[email protected]>
> 2012/5/23 Graham Lauder <[email protected]> > > Scaled response and open response questions are always better in terms > of > > data > > that is dealing with aesthetics and feelings. The art with these answers > > is > > in the interpretation. A Yes/no response to a question is not an answer > > it's > > a vote and a sign of lazy Poll design. We don't need to do that, we > don't > > have department heads breathing down our necks and waving deadlines under > > our > > noses so as there is no pressure, our Survey design should be tops. > > > > Indeed. Yet, Scaled questions should have a odd number of choices and > should be used for quantification. Five is a fair number, in my view. Open > questions should be used for qualification. They are harder to plot. > > > > > > What I would like to be able to do is to design a survey, collate the > data, > > make a decision based on that data, publish it and then be able to point > > directly at a feature or design element that we can say was due to > feedback > > from the survey. This gives our surveys gravitas with users and we are > > more > > likely to get quality responses to later surveys. > > > > This could be usefull to show users that their wishes are being heard, > discussed and can be implemented in the software someway. > > The questions will cover that too. The intent of the questionnaires are to be used (also) in the future of AOO. And they will be translated into appropriate languages. Those who want to create user focus questions are welcome. Albino
