Hi, Rob 2012/5/29 Rob Weir <[email protected]>: ... > > You could be in error. I hope you acknowledge that as a possibility. > I could be in error s well. So what either one of us believes is not > really the point, is it? Thus the suggestion to clarify the policy. > >> Category-B tarballs are there in an attempt to work around the >> fact that we are only supposed to be using binaries. >> > > The restriction concerning category-b binaries is a restriction on releases. > >> No other Apache project is carrying sources and patches to >> MPL'd tarballs in the repositories and, other than the >> configure option, we are giving them basically the same >> treatment as Category-A. >> > > We're not including category-b source in releases. If we learned > anything in the last year I'd hope we learned that this was an > important distinction. > Release includes some JavaScript source having MPL header from moz module in openoffice.org/basis3.4/program/defaults and greprefs directories.
>> I won't spend any more energy on the issue but feel free to >> do all the consultations you want, and don't take the second >> alternative as a threat. >> > > How should I take it then? > >> Pedro. -- Tsutomu
