Sent from my tablet On Oct 13, 2012 11:00 PM, "Kay Schenk" <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: >
?.. > > It never occurred to me that any of them would have necessarily been > interested. The fact that it never occurred to anyone participating in the definition of the PMC membership is, in my opinion, a major failing of process which was designed to identify people with sufficient merit. I would have thought all of your active mentors have earned sufficient merit and should have been invited to join. Furthermore, at least on mentor indicated a desire to serve on the PMC, so there was no need for it to "occur" to anyone, it was explicit. This is the first time I've seen a PPMC fail nominate its active mentors as PMC members. There is a lesson in there for the community but it is no longer my place to convey what I think that lesson is (since my last mail was my last as a mentor) Ross
