On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > On Oct 14, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile >> <arie...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: >>>> The fact that it never occurred to anyone participating in the definition >>>> of the PMC membership is, in my opinion, a major failing of process which >>>> was designed to identify people with sufficient merit. >>> >>> Now that you mentioned it, the process was more democratic, than >>> meritocratic: it didn't only fail to identify people with sufficient >>> merit, it also failed to measure merit (that's why I voted 0). >>> >> >> Isn't this easy to solve? All we need is for one proposed PMC-member >> to say that they will, as one of their first actions as a TLP PMC >> member, propose the former mentors for PMC membership. >> >> Is anyone willing to state this? > > Yes. That has been my plan. I also would accept any additions to the PMC that > the Board chooses to make.
+1 ...and I think we no longer need to string this thread out. (IMHO) > > Regards, > Dave > >> >> -Rob >> >> >>> >>> Regards >>> -- >>> Ariel Constenla-Haile >>> La Plata, Argentina >
