On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:50:06PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: >> The fact that it never occurred to anyone participating in the definition >> of the PMC membership is, in my opinion, a major failing of process which >> was designed to identify people with sufficient merit. > > Now that you mentioned it, the process was more democratic, than > meritocratic: it didn't only fail to identify people with sufficient > merit, it also failed to measure merit (that's why I voted 0). >
Isn't this easy to solve? All we need is for one proposed PMC-member to say that they will, as one of their first actions as a TLP PMC member, propose the former mentors for PMC membership. Is anyone willing to state this? -Rob > > Regards > -- > Ariel Constenla-Haile > La Plata, Argentina
