On Monday, October 22, 2012, RGB ES wrote: > 2012/10/21 Kevin Grignon <kevingrignon...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > > KG01 - see comments inline. > > > > On Oct 21, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Alexandro Colorado > > <j...@oooes.org<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > > [snip] > > > > > >> > > >>> But speaking for myself, I'd really like to see a comprehensive > > >>> proposal, since one criticism of our current state is that we lack a > > >>> comprehensive approach. Especially for those who are not familiar > > >>> with this old logo dispute with Oracle, it would be good to put down, > > >>> in one place (the wiki) a complete proposal. > > >>> > > >> > > >> That said I am aware of the horrible time that the Branding Guidelines > > >> took to be set in place, almost 6 months after working with Oracle. > But > > is > > >> a testimony of how intense and thorough this work most be to take to > > create > > >> Visual Design, and guidelines. > > >> > > > > > > > KG01 - creating a visual identity spec can be slot of work, and does > > require a comprehensive approach > > > > However, I propose we try and keep it simple and focus on what we need. > > For example, start with an inventory of what we have, set some goals and > go > > from there. > > > > > There is an open discussion about MIME type icons on the forum: > > http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=106&t=55270 > > Regards > Ricardo > > > KG02 - Again, let's be clear. Product visual identity, including logo and > logo type are different from file type icons.
> > > > I have some concepts I will share. >
