I am not insulting, but you keep re-asking questions that I have already indicated have no meaning. I can only answer the question you ask, and you've been answering a lot of unanswerable questions the last couple of days. The direct equivalent to the java call() method is SendMessage(). If you have asked that orignally, you would have been asking a question that was easily answered. There is no additional setup required, other than ensuring you have a vailid RexxThreadContext() object with which to make the call. That can be easily obtained by using AttachThread() on any valid interpreter instance. If you use AttachThread(), then make sure you use DetachThread() to release the instance before returning back to Java. This can be done in about 10 lines of code.
Rick On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote: > > Rick McGuire wrote: >> Um, no....and I have no idea where any of these words came from. >> >> There is no such concept as a defineable/settable context environment. >> So it that sense, yes this is true. It is also pure giberish. I >> have no idea what you think you're trying to do here. but you >> obviously don't understand what's going on as well as you seem to >> think you do. >> > Please stop insulting! > > --- > > For the benefit of the ooRexx programmers I would like to be able to do > the following: > <http://wi.wu-wien.ac.at/rgf/rexx/bsf4rexx/current/docs/docs.apache.bsf/org/apache/bsf/BSFEngine.html#call(java.lang.Object,%20java.lang.String,%20java.lang.Object[])>. > > This was defined more than ten years ago! > > And yes, I am one of the maintainers and committers of Apache BSF which > BTW originated at IBM, if that helps you realize the knowledge that we > talk about here. > > And, you know that, but others who read this list may not: I was one of > those experts (<http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=223>) on the JCP JSR-223 > group that defined the scripting framework for Java for more than three > years. (JSR-223 got introduced into the Java language with version 6.0.) > > --- > > If the specifications of the language had been specified explicitly in > the open, probably none of the many questions would have been necessary > and a lot of time and resources could have been saved. > > ---rony > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your > production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to > Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 > Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image > processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
