Hi Jean-Louis,

that's great - thank you all.

I have a naive question - does the fact that we have Linux builds for
several flavours mean that B - Linux expert is redundant - or is there a
lot of build independent stuff we need on Linux - I know on Windows there
is the ole stuff, ooDialog and even a live bug about shelling out.  Are
there equivalent linux things?  When I look in the platform folder it seems
to be mainly (all?) about building.  Can I remove B from the list?

Jon

  A - The interpreter itself Jean-Louis (debugs)  B - Linux expert  C -
Windows expert  D - Project Lifecycle administrator  E - Installer expert
Michael  Rene (MacOSX)  F - Builds Michael (Linux)  Rene (RaspPi MacOSX
z/os)  Jean-Louis (MacOs Yosemiti Ubuntu Win)  G - The test framework Erich  H
- The test suite Erich (5.0)  Jean Louis  I - The documentation processing
(Docbook).   Erich (5.0 RexxRef)  Walter (tickets)  J - ooDialog


On 14 April 2015 at 00:40, Jean-Louis Faucher <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jon
>
> I can build and debug under MacOs Yosemite, Ubuntu 14.04 and Windows 8.1.
> So you can put my name near A for the debugs, near F for the builds and
> near H for the tests associated to a bug fix.
>
> Best regards
> Jean-Louis
>
> 2015-04-13 21:52 GMT+02:00 Jon Wolfers <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi Walter,
>>
>> I've put you down for I, though there will be other aspects to that
>> (unless of course you learn to do the doc build), but I think it is fine to
>> have several people to one area - the problem is when we have too few
>> rather than too many.
>>
>> Rene, that is impressive.  I've marked you down - hopefully correctly in
>> installer and builds.  I am also keen to see BSF4ooRexx closer to ooRexx,
>> but I think we need to finish the conversation about what resources we have
>> before we have the conversation about how we proceed.  But don't let that
>> stop you figuring out how to do it in the meantime :)
>>
>>   A - The interpreter itself  B - Linux expert  C - Windows expert  D -
>> Project Lifecycle administrator  E - Installer expert Michael  Rene
>> (MacOSX)  F - Builds Michael (Linux)  Rene (RaspPi MacOSX z/os)  G - The
>> test framework Erich  H - The test suite (the actual tests written using
>> the test framework) Erich (5.0)  I - The documentation processing
>> (Docbook).   Erich (5.0 RexxRef)  Walter (tickets)  J - ooDialog
>> Jon
>>
>> On 13 April 2015 at 19:50, René Jansen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> I want to register for:
>>>
>>>
>>>    - MacOSX build, test and package
>>>    - Raspberry Pi (Raspian) test and build
>>>    - z/OS build and test - I have the machine now so we can start
>>>
>>>
>>> It might be good if we could get into repositories, like apt-get, yum
>>> for the different Linux distributions and instruction set architectures and
>>> for the Mac, mac brew and mac ports. Mark H might know how to do this, as I
>>> can install Regina for all of them. I know Bruce did a lot of work on Mac
>>> installers (after I did that earlier) and Rony’s students also did some Mac
>>> installers - we should get a 4.2.X installer online quickly. For the
>>> non-windows versions (that cannot run ooDialog) I suggest we include
>>> BSF4ooRexx as stopgap. I would not hurt for the windows installers, either.
>>>
>>>
>>> best regards,
>>>
>>> René.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13 apr. 2015, at 18:38, Jon Wolfers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Michael and Erich,
>>>
>>> It's good to get the ball rolling.
>>>
>>> I've seen another omission to the list which is ooDialog - although we
>>> will later have to have some decisions about what to do with ooDialog, it
>>> is important to many of our users so I've added it to the list.
>>>
>>> I've put Erich and Michael's name next to the items that they have
>>> expressed interest in, but that should not prevent others from coming
>>> forward for the same items - no one is committed yet and many hands make
>>> light work.
>>>
>>> Erich, thank you for your offer of funds - I believe that RexxLa
>>> provided a machine for the builds, but that died some time ago, and David
>>> was kindly hosting the build machine on his own hardware, which he was no
>>> doubt eager to reclaim.  The RexxLa board had a chat about this last week
>>> and think they have sufficient funds to host a future build machine on a
>>> leased server in a proper server farm.  I believe David is going to send a
>>> zip of the code.
>>>
>>> One other thing I forgot to mention this morning was that I asked Les to
>>> administer the ooRexx mailing lists as he was keen to contribute.
>>>
>>> Here is the table now, hopefully I'm not misunderstanding or
>>> misrepresenting anyone's interest.
>>>
>>>   A - The interpreter itself  B - Linux expert  C - Windows expert  D -
>>> Project Lifecycle administrator  E - Installer expert Michael  F -
>>> Builds Michael (Linux)  G - The test framework Erich  H - The test
>>> suite (the actual tests written using the test framework) Erich (5.0)  I
>>> - The documentation processing (Docbook).   Erich (5.0 RexxRef)  J -
>>> ooDialog
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13 April 2015 at 12:47, Erich Steinböck <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> G - The test framework
>>>>> H - The test suite (the actual tests written using the test framework)
>>>>> I - The documentation processing (Docbook).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd be willing contribute with the following -
>>>>
>>>>    - document 5.0 features for ooRexx Reference
>>>>    - write any needed test cases
>>>>    - dive into the test framework (though I haven't yet had any look
>>>>    at it)
>>>>
>>>> (Any detailed hints regarding above are very welcome, e.g. what and how
>>>> exactly needs to be installed for DocBook in a Windows environment)
>>>>
>>>> I'd also be willing to participate in any running costs we have, like,
>>>> if maybe cost has been the reason why the build machine was shut down
>>>>
>>>> Erich
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jon Wolfers <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Rick,
>>>>> Absolutely agree - New list (complete with letters):
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    - A - The interpreter itself
>>>>>    - B - Linux expert
>>>>>    - C - Windows expert
>>>>>    - D - Project Lifecycle administrator
>>>>>    - E - Installer expert
>>>>>    - F - Builds
>>>>>    - G - The test framework
>>>>>    - H - The test suite (the actual tests written using the test
>>>>>    framework)
>>>>>    - I - The documentation processing (Docbook).
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13 April 2015 at 10:48, Rick McGuire <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some additional major areas:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The test framework
>>>>>> The test suite (the actual tests written using the test framework)
>>>>>> The documentation processing (Docbook).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Jon Wolfers <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BCC: RexxLa Board
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Developers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> whilst I in no way wish to cut short the thanks to Rick and David -
>>>>>>> and goodness, they deserve it, I think the time has come to at least 
>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>> a conversation about the future of the project.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rick and David and Mark covered all the bases, but it was a stretch
>>>>>>> for them, and they often wished that they received more assistance.  It 
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> not entirely clear what the future holds, but Rick and David have both 
>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>> that whilst they are happy to advise, their period of doing the work is
>>>>>>> over.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That means that if ooRexx is to remain a live project we are going
>>>>>>> to have to come up with people with the skills who are happy to do the
>>>>>>> things that need to be done, either from within our own ranks or from 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> Rexx community.  Whether or not this is possible is what I want to
>>>>>>> ascertain over the next months.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For myself, I have few of the technical attributes required for
>>>>>>> administering or even developing this project, but I am a seasoned user 
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> ooRexx and I appreciate what a thing of beauty it is, and would like to
>>>>>>> carry on doing whatever I can to keep it alive.  No-one wants to be 
>>>>>>> tied to
>>>>>>> something very demanding if it turns out to be doomed to fail, so I am
>>>>>>> saying that I will give this a year and then review it.  I definitely 
>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>> myself as holding the position against the day that someone better 
>>>>>>> equipped
>>>>>>> comes along.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems to me that there are several major areas that we need
>>>>>>> active participants in:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    - The interpreter itself
>>>>>>>    - Linux expert
>>>>>>>    - Windows expert
>>>>>>>    - Project Lifecycle administrator
>>>>>>>    - Installer expert
>>>>>>>    - Builds
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps there are other areas.  I would welcome people coming
>>>>>>> forward, even if only to make tentative commitments in these areas.  
>>>>>>> That
>>>>>>> will give us some idea of how ambitious or unambitious we need to be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rick and David are no longer project administrators.  I was unhappy
>>>>>>> with the idea of being the only administrator, so I asked Les Koehler 
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> rexxLa to take on an administrative role, much as one might give a key 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> your next door neighbour for safe keeping - he is our safe pair of 
>>>>>>> hands.
>>>>>>> I would like in time for most if not all committers to share the
>>>>>>> administration role, but we must see what emerges.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are some big questions to answer, particularly concerning
>>>>>>> ooRexx 5.0 and ooDialog, but I think it would be helpful to review who 
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> have on board and who we can find before attempting to put together a
>>>>>>> strategy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let the conversation commence...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
>>>>>>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
>>>>>>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
>>>>>>> exercises
>>>>>>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
>>>>>>> event?utm_
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
>>>>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
>>>>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
>>>>> exercises
>>>>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
>>>>> event?utm_
>>>>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
>>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
>>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
>>> exercises
>>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
>>> event?utm_
>>>
>>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF_______________________________________________
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
>> exercises
>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
>> event?utm_
>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
> exercises
> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
> event?utm_
> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to