Well, another year has gone by since this was last proposed and to my knowledge, we still have NOT addressed the "unfinished business" left over from the 5.0.0 release, namely the bug fixes and RFEs that were never officially closed.  From my post of 29 Nov 2023:

"I guess I need to refresh everyone's memory on this topic.  When we released 5.0.0 about a year ago, it contained a lot of changes!  The CHANGES file listed 361 bug fixes, 169 RFEs, 66 documentation bug fixes and 10 patches.  Unfortunately, some of the bug fixes and RFEs were NOT in the "pending" state but still in the "accepted" state which indicated additional work items - typically doc, and/or test - were not complete.  Rather than delay the release any longer(!) until they were all in the pending" state", it was decided to proceed, listing them as included in the release.  Shortly following the release, all the "pending" items were changed to "closed" as well as SOME of the "accepted" ones. Since that time, additional items have been completed and their status changed to "pending" or "closed" but there remain a number that are still unresolved.  My analysis indicates that there are 11 bugs - 1447, 1624, 1625, 1656, 1742, 1762, 1763, 1786, 1827, 1837,  and 1838 - and 11 RFEs - 353, 544, 550, 552, 569, 576, 578, 581, 603, 754, and 803 - still to be completed.  Whether we decide to do a bug-fix release - 5.0.1 - or a new feature release - 5.1.0 - it is time to clean up this "unfinished business".

Perhaps some of these have been resolved since then but I suspect that most of them haven't been since they are "out of sight, out of mind".  In any case, it is easy to check each of them to get a "current" list of what remains to be addressed.

To me, ignoring this issue is simply unprofessional and "sloppy" and we ought to clean it up or we risk setting a precedent that this project is not serious.  Just my opinion.

Gil B.
RexxDay 16,714

On 12/21/2024 4:25 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Is there anything that needs to be done before creating a new release of ooRexx 5.1.0?

When would who be available in the next ten to fourteen days to start the process by creating a release candidate?

---rony




_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

--
Gil Barmwater



_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to