On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:06:29 +0100, Lars Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps Timothy has some updates on the legal stuff in doing Windows > graphics driver development. There really is no point in setting up a > free development environment for doing the Windows kernel limbo, if we > cannot release it. I'm not sure I CAN have an update. I just don't have enough information. However, my uninformed opinion is that we can release MOST of the driver source under an open source license that is BSD or MIT style and tell people that if they want to build the driver, they have to either get the MS DDK. If we can find another way to do it, that's great too, but I don't see it as such a big deal. Most people won't use the source to the Windows version. Most people won't use the source to the Mac or Solaris versions either, even though those would be totally open source. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
