On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:03:52 -0500
"Timothy Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By releasing it under GPL, we can still share it under terms that FOSS
> people like. But for anyone who doesn't want to infect the rest of
> their design, they can pay for a proprietary license. The LGPL
> doesn't require that.
IMHO it would be a good idea to release everything
under the GPL - Dual license we developed. Mostly because
1) it's free (as in freedom)
2) it prevents other (honest) companies to misuse the code
3) it gives Traversal the right to sell the code and thus
make money with it.
Attila Kinali
--
wer soviel schoggi isst, kann sowieso nicht dumm sein ;-)
-- Sandra
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
