On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:14:31 -0500
"Timothy Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For OGP, this wouldn't be a problem, but exactly what we
> > wanted: a chip with our design and full specs.
> > Traversal on the other hand would then have a founding problem.
> >
>
> I think it might indeed be a problem for OGP. If Traversal is killed,
> OGP loses its centralized corporate wing. So you get OGC1 more
> cheaply. But what about OGC2?
Hmm... Right. Short sighted thinking on my side.
Sorry.
Attila Kinali
--
wer soviel schoggi isst, kann sowieso nicht dumm sein ;-)
-- Sandra
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
