Timothy Miller wrote:
On 6/5/06, Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is why I highly encourage Traversal to follow a
simple dual-licensing strategy (GPL and proprietary)
and to NOT license anything under the LGPL.
Dual-licensing GPL/proprietary maximizes the users'
freedom and Traversal's profit at the same time, by
ensuring that another company can't "run off" with the
design, improve it, and not give back the
improvements.
I agree, and I have been transitioning in that direction. Perhaps we
should scour the wiki and make sure this is consistent.
snip
According to Google the word LGPL is found on these pages:
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=FrequentlyAskedQuestions
wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=OGPN1
wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=OGD1
twiki search finds a few more
wiki:
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=FrequentlyAskedQuestions&highlight=LGPL
and also the french version for the page:
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=FrequentlyAskedQuestions%2Ffr&highlight=LGPL
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=software+model&highlight=LGPL
blog:
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-view_blog_post.php?blogId=1&postId=1&highlight=LGPL
google found these too, but for completeness sake.
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=OGPN1&highlight=LGPL
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=OGD1&highlight=LGPL
jb
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
