--- josephhenryblack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Timothy Miller wrote: > > On 6/5/06, Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> This is why I highly encourage Traversal to > follow a > >> simple dual-licensing strategy (GPL and > proprietary) > >> and to NOT license anything under the LGPL. > >> Dual-licensing GPL/proprietary maximizes the > users' > >> freedom and Traversal's profit at the same time, > by > >> ensuring that another company can't "run off" > with the > >> design, improve it, and not give back the > >> improvements. > > > > I agree, and I have been transitioning in that > direction. Perhaps we > > should scour the wiki and make sure this is > consistent. > snip > > According to Google the word LGPL is found on these > pages:
Thank you for finding where LGPL appeared in the Wiki. I've changed the references from LGPL to GPL, except in the blog, which can't be modified: http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-view_blog_post.php?blogId=1&postId=1&highlight=LGPL -Mark _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
