On 7/11/06, Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 10 July 2006 05:58, Patrick McNamara wrote:
>
> vsync:
> NOOP 1 ; last 4 pixels of hsync
> NOOP 2 [h] ; back porch
> NOOP 640 [h] ; active period, but vblank
> NOOP 2 [h] ; front porch
This looks downright silly, and it could be misleading too. This
subroutine is definitely doing something, but if you look at it you
wouldn't say so. Could we write NODATA instead of NOOP?
How about SIG ?
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
