FYI : about cross distro compatibility and sometime the need to link statically some difficult librairies, see : www.autopackage.org
Le mardi 22 août 2006 à 11:30 -0400, Timothy Miller a écrit : > > As far as distributions and different versions of libc go, neither one > > matter if you do things correctly. Just create executables that aren't > > dependant on external resources and you'll have a binary that runs on > > every x86 Linux system. > > Bad, bad, bad. You do not want to start advocating statically-linked > executables. Massive bloat. > _______________________________________________ > Open-graphics mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics > List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com) > _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
