On 3/19/07, Timothy Normand Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/18/07, Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 March 2007 19:38, Timothy Normand Miller wrote:
> > Latest revisions:
> >
> > http://www.traversaltech.com/ogd1_press/ogd1-graphics.pdf
>
> * There is a much nicer image over on
> http://nova.student.utwente.nl/~lourens/gfx/opengraphics/press/
> IIRC, these press images were mirrored on the TT site as well.

Thank you.  I can't keep track of all of this.  :)

Also, thanks to Simon for doing another one.

Also, I think GIMP needs more work on its UI usability.

Wow, here's how you can tell I was tired yesterday - if I'd thoroughly
read Lourens' email, I wouldn't have gone all the way through with
that. Still, at least I'm a bit more comfortable with the GIMP now
than I was 24 hours ago.  You wouldn't be the first to complain about
its UI, and a while ago someone actually forked it to make the UI look
like photoshop (they called it GIMPShop).


I assume the TM should be superscript.  The (R) also?

no:
™(r)(c)

What about OpenGL?  Conexant?  X11?

Wasn't OpenGL sold?  Why does SGI's stuff still indicate that they
hold the trademark?

see http://www.opengl.org/pipeline/article/vol002_1/ - At the bottom
of the page there they cite the trademark too.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to