Thanks! So it seems to me like this compiler is a bit more consistent 
than the xilinx one. On xilinx i get rather different timing and 
utilization results between v2 and v3, even though they are logically the 
same.

On Fri, August 31, 2007 11:19 am, Mark said:
> I've posted a run-down of the multipliers so far (any important ones 
> missing?) at http://jarvin.net/opengraphics/.  This includes photos of 
> the most critical path post-PAR. 
> _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing
> list [email protected] 
> http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service
> provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to