Timothy Normand Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I asked about the pci thing in a previous post and was ignored.
I suggested the vga thing in a previous post and was ignored.
Feeling like you're being ignored seems to be a common problem on
mailing lists. It's nothing personal. I try to respond to a lot of
stuff, but sometimes I can't because I'm too busy or because I don't
even get to the email in a reasonable time. I hope that others will
respond instead, and they often do, but it doesn't always happen.
I said in a previous post some other more baseline functionality
should have been available before the high-end graphics stuff was
working and was ignored.
Why do you feel ignored on this point when in fact we're doing just
this? The high-end graphics stuff is just a model written in C. All
the hardware stuff is focusing on critical subsystems like PCI,
memory, video output, etc. The PCI, memory, and video systems work
very well, in fact!
I don't need any of this stuff now because i've worked around it.
I'm glad to hear that your work wasn't impeded by our slowness.
I would have got vga functionality working to some degree before
any press releases because that would acid test for any bugs as
well as being easier to sell.
I never needed strict "vga" anyway. Just a framebuffer that
can do 24bit color at 1280x1024. It would be a starting point
for many other things.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
