Thanks, Bill! This is very helpful!
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:44 AM,
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:44:38 -0400
> From: Bill Erickson <beric...@gmail.com>
> To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Which OpenSRF gateway should I use?
> Hi Jane,
> I can say unequivocally that you should not use /gateway. The weird /* */
> doodads are not valid JSON. I'll open a LP bug for deprecating this.
> /osrf-gateway-v1 is fine. I see no reason that it won't be around for the
> foreseeable future. This interface uses a layer of abstraction one step
> above OpenSRF, though. It does not support streaming responses or OpenSRF
> sessions (useful for client-driven DB transactions). The beauty of this
> interface is that it's simple to test in a browser (as you have found).
> /osrf-http-translator provides a lower level OpenSRF API and supports
> streaming responses, but its use is no longer encouraged, because the
> underlying mechanism (multipart/x-mixed-replace) is deprecated and only
> works with our old version of XULRunner. This interface will likely be
> deprecated along with the XUL client.
> /osrf-websocket-translator (from newer versions of EG/OpenSRF) provides a
> standard OpenSRF API, streaming responses, etc. It's new enough, though,
> that it's not universally deployed.
> WebSockets install docs:
> Hope this helps,
Electronic Resources Librarian
Linn-Benton Community College
sand...@linnbenton.edu / 541-917-4655