This is what I see in the copy editor. I scanned three items. Highlighted all three then chose to Edit Items. One is shown here and all three are along the top of the page (volumes). How do I change the shelving location for all three at once?
Diane Disbro Branch Manager/Circulation Coordinator Union Branch Scenic Regional Library 308 Hawthorne Drive Union, MO 63084 (636) 583-3224 On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Janet Schrader <[email protected]> wrote: > Diane, > > I have been able to edit multiple items at the same time on our training > server using 3.0. The copy record edit screen no longer shows all the > barcodes and attributes for each item like in xul. These show on the left > side under the working copies tab. This display is small and cutoff so you > may not see all the barcodes but the multiple edits are working for me. > > > > Janet > > > > Janet Schrader > > Bibliographic Services Supervisor | CW MARS > > 67 Millbrook Street, Suite 201, Worcester, MA 01606 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=67+Millbrook+Street,+Suite+201,+Worcester,+MA+01606&entry=gmail&source=g> > > P: 508-755-3323 x 325 <(508)%20755-3323> | F: 508-757-7801 > <(508)%20757-7801> > > ------------------------------ > > [email protected] || http;//cwmars.org <http://www.cwmars.org/> > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:45 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Diane, >> >> Thank you for sharing these. Please see my comments below. >> >> >> >> Scott >> >> >> >> *From:* Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-bounc >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Diane Disbro >> *Sent:* Monday, March 19, 2018 11:10 AM >> *To:* Evergreen Discussion Group <[email protected] >> libraries.org> >> *Cc:* megan maurer <[email protected]>; Steven Campbell < >> [email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] discouraged >> >> >> >> Good morning - >> >> >> >> I appreciate hearing from several communities members their frustrations >> and suggestions for using the web client. >> >> >> >> Showstoppers for me are: >> >> - The inability to edit item attributes in the copy editor of more >> than one item at a time. This one sounds bad. We have not had it >> reported to us yet. I can’t find it in Launchpad (but I always have >> trouble >> finding bugs in Launchpad). Can someone else find it? >> - Losing settings and workstation registration after clearing the >> browser cache or restarting the computer. In Chrome, I was not able >> to replicate this by going into Clear Browsing Data and selecting Clear >> Cached Images and File, but I was able to replicate it by selecting Clear >> Cookies and Other Site Data. We rarely ask our libraries to clear cookies >> which is why this hasn’t been a problem for us. I am not sure why a >> computer restart would reset it unless the PC has Deep Freeze or some type >> of configuration that clears cookies upon reboot. >> - The frequent need to clear the browser cache because of system >> freeze. Unlike with XUL where it happened all the time, we rarely >> experience system freezes with the Web Client and, if we did, the advice >> would be to simply close and re-open the browser. Sometimes we do need to >> ask libraries to clear the cache when a bug fix has been applied, but, in >> our experience, it does not remove the Web Client settings. >> - Several functions require being applied twice before the the >> function is performed. Can you give us specific examples? >> - Dymo printers aren't compatible with the web client. Are these for >> printing spine labels? >> >> I chose the top five from my list of thirty-six. >> >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> Diane Disbro >> >> Branch Manager/Circulation Coordinator >> >> Union Branch >> >> Scenic Regional Library >> >> 308 Hawthorne Drive >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=308+Hawthorne+Drive+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Union,+MO++63084&entry=gmail&source=g> >> >> Union, MO >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=308+Hawthorne+Drive+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Union,+MO++63084&entry=gmail&source=g> >> >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=308+Hawthorne+Drive+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Union,+MO++%C2%A0+%C2%A0++63084&entry=gmail&source=g> >> 63084 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=308+Hawthorne+Drive+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+Union,+MO++63084&entry=gmail&source=g> >> >> (636) 583-3224 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Kathy Lussier <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Diane, >> >> I'm sorry to hear your frustration, but I can also empathize. While >> working on a recent project to sponsor more bug fixes for the web client, I >> also got discouraged as new bugs were reported, particularly when they were >> ones that would have made our priority list if we had known about them at >> the time we were selecting bugs to fix. To keep myself from getting >> discouraged, I found it helped to keep some things in mind. >> >> - Despite the current open bugs, the web client has come a long way just >> in the past year. Setting aside the addition of serials and offline, there >> has been a lot of bug fixing over the last months. In many cases, the >> fixes have been for what I consider to be showstopper bugs. I continued to >> see this work even today as I was going through my bug mail. It might be >> useful for the community to track statistics of how many web client bugs >> are getting fixed on a monthly basis to help us see the progress that's >> been done. Looking at the 3.0 point release notes is also a good way to see >> how much work has been done. >> >> - There were many people, including myself, who spent a lot of time >> testing the web client when the code was initially written, but, no matter >> how much testing was done, we knew that there are just some bugs that just >> won't be found until people start using it in production. This isn't unique >> to Evergreen or open-source software, but is something I've seen when using >> proprietary software as well. We tried to catch some of these bugs by >> having 2.12 available for trial use in production, but I don't think most >> sites really started using the web client heavily until 3.0, which was >> just released in October. I would say the flurry of bug reporting since >> that time is an expected part of the process of eventually getting to a >> more stable web client. This is also why we are keeping the xul client >> around through the 3.1 release, because we knew it would take time to get >> the web client to where it needs to be for all Evergreen users to move to >> it. >> >> I still remember the early days of the Template Toolkit catalog. I was >> equally discouraged about bugs and missing features, but as more sites >> started using it, they made sure features important to them were fixed or >> added, and we now have a stable and feature rich public catalog. >> >> - I'm worried about stating this the wrong way, but we also have to >> remember the number of bugs we've learned to live with under the xul >> client. I'm not saying we should just learn to live with the web client >> bugs, but they certainly are more noticeable now because they are new. >> There are also several xul client bugs we were able to close out because >> they were fixed in the web client. The important thing is that the bugs are >> open and known. Evergreen sites can see where the problems are and >> ultimately choose to focus on addressing the ones most important to them. >> >> Having said all of this, I do think it's important that if there are >> showstopper bugs in the web client (not annoyances, but things that really >> prevent you from using the web client), we need to identify those to >> increase the likelihood that they will be fixed ahead of other bugs. For >> example, one of the groups I work with recently set the bug priority to >> High for a handful of bugs they considered to be showstoppers. Back in the >> Template Toolkit days, there was a tag we used in Launchpad that identified >> bugs we thought should be fixed before removing the old catalog from >> Evergreen. Maybe we could consider doing something similar for the web >> client. >> >> Kathy >> >> >> >> >> >> On 03/16/2018 03:27 PM, Diane Disbro wrote: >> >> Good afternoon - >> >> >> >> I volunteered to keep track of Webby problems for the Missouri Evergreen >> circulation committee. I am pretty discouraged. My library began using >> Webby in December but there were so many frustrations that we stopped after >> about a month. My spreadsheet of problems now has thirty-five issue on it. >> Every time a new bug report is sent out my heart sinks. >> >> Diane Disbro >> >> Branch Manager/Circulation Coordinator >> >> Union Branch >> >> Scenic Regional Library >> >> 308 Hawthorne Drive >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=308+Hawthorne+Drive+%0D%0A+++++++++++++++++++++++++Union,+MO+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+63084&entry=gmail&source=g> >> >> Union, MO 63084 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=308+Hawthorne+Drive+%0D%0A+++++++++++++++++++++++++Union,+MO+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+63084&entry=gmail&source=g> >> >> (636) 583-3224 >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Kathy Lussier >> >> Project Coordinator >> >> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative >> >> (508) 343-0128 >> >> [email protected] >> >> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier >> >> >> > >
