Benjamin Li wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 03:51 -0700, Rakesh Ranjan wrote:
>>> > Hi Rakesh, > > Converting the dependency between uIP and UIO shouldn't be a problem. > We can make them more generic. I apologize if it is a tad bit of a > mess. The coupling of uIP and UIO was from early versions of uIP; I > haven't had the time to think, work, and clean up the code to accomplish > this. =( > > Please let me know what your plans are on how the Chelsio driver will > communicate from user-space to the hardware and we can add/modify the > hooks in the uIP stack. > Hi Li, Isn't it possible to get rid of __brcm_iscsiuio__ daemon and move the related userspace UIO implementation into vendor provided library and do the needed modification into __iscsid__, so that depending upon configuration __iscsid__ would utilize the vendor provided hooks inside the vendor library to send/recv events. IMHO it would be neat approach. To provide configurable option to vendor library we could use __iface/nic0__ interface. Ex. iface.nic_handler = "lib_handler.so"; iface.rx_poll_usec = "10"; iface.nic_dev = "/dev/uio0" Regards Rakesh Ranjan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
