On 09/03/2009 07:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Mike Christie wrote: >> A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will it? :) I do >> not think a changelog will help either since it is the first version of a >> RFC patch. > Mike, signature is needed and helpful, I assume you sign all the patches
For sig do you mean the Sign-off line? I do not require sigs for userspace or open-iscsi.org patches. Check out the git logs and you will see some patches have them but most do not. If you mean sig as in a patch description then there was one. > you send to James, isn't it... change log is always needed and helpful, I was just saying the change log at that point would only say - v1 sent initial patch. And I do not think that tells you anything. > specifically, when you send someone an RFC, anyway, to your question > >> From the subject of the mail and the body it looks like Rakesh is trying to >> port libiscsi to older distro kernels (RHEL 5 and SLES 10 based) so he can >> support cxgb3i on them. I am just asking you guys if you also need RHEL 4 >> and SLES 9 support. > I am not aware to special need to support rh4 and sles9 > > > Or. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
