On 09/03/2009 07:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will it? :) I do 
>> not think a changelog will help either since it is the first  version of a 
>> RFC patch.
> Mike, signature is needed and helpful, I assume you sign all the patches 

For sig do you mean the Sign-off line? I do not require sigs for userspace or 
open-iscsi.org patches. Check out the git logs and you will see some patches 
have them but most do not.

If you mean sig as in a patch description then there was one.

> you send to James, isn't it... change log is always needed and helpful, 

I was just saying the change log at that point would only say
- v1 sent initial patch.

And I do not think that tells you anything.

> specifically, when you send someone an RFC, anyway, to your question
>> From the subject of the mail and the body it looks like Rakesh is trying to 
>> port libiscsi to older distro kernels (RHEL 5 and SLES 10 based) so he can 
>> support cxgb3i on them. I am just asking you guys if you also need RHEL 4 
>> and SLES 9 support.
> I am not aware to special need to support rh4 and sles9
> Or.
> > 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi

Reply via email to