On 09/03/2009 12:17 PM, Mike Christie wrote: > On 09/03/2009 11:37 AM, Mike Christie wrote: >> On 09/03/2009 07:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >>> Mike Christie wrote: >>>> A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will it? :) I >>>> do not think a changelog will help either since it is the first version >>>> of a RFC patch. >>> Mike, signature is needed and helpful, I assume you sign all the patches >> For sig do you mean the Sign-off line? I do not require sigs for userspace >> or open-iscsi.org patches. Check out the git logs and you will see some >> patches have them but most do not. >> > > How does a signed off help you understand what the patch is doing btw? Do you > need one for work/personal-preference, before you can read the patch/email > description or subject?
That sounded kind of jerky. I probably only meant the first part that way, because I am not sure how just a signed off helps you understand what is going on :) But the second part I was serious. If people need to work on projects that require signed offs then we can get more strict on that. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
