On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Buhrmaster, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Would a more lightweight process be acceptable, in >> that any code needs to be accompanied by the >> equivalent of the Linux "Developers Certificate >> of Origin" signoff (by the developer)? >> >> That puts the onerous on the submitters to insure >> that their submissions meets their (and/or their >> employers) requirements. > > I think that's the sort of agreement that Derrick has in mind (as opposed > to the FSF-style copyright assignment, which however nice in the abstract > would be a major pain and isn't really tenable). Personally, I'd rather > sign it once rather than providing a new copy with each code submission, > since I can readily agree to something like that.
I assume an Apache-style grant (not assignment) http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt would be acceptable, though? Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
