> I can also see the Patent License grant in the paragraph after that being > problematic. > > Why do we need a contributor agreement that goes beyond saying that the > contributor is legally permitted to provide the contribution under the > chosen license?
I think we need an assertion that code is free of known patent encumberance, or, if encumberance is known, a grant of patent license, before we can accept given code. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
