That would be great for me. The trick is to make sure both groups' purposes are clearly defined so that would-be signer-uppers know which one they need. Also, posts would need to be moderated a bit to redirect folks to the appropriate list if they go off-topic.
Thanks, Zack -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Williamson Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [OpenBD] Re: building from source - writing the ebuild Zack you raise an interesting point and you are not the first to suggest it. I think we'll create a new "openbd-dev" list for discussions such as these, and this list can be left to pure CFML/installation discussions. would that work? Zack Pitts wrote: > Please consider ways to separate these concerns so as to insulate basic CFML > users from the underlying concerns of the Java implementation. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
